01 / Commercial estimating
Review Desk
A decade of estimating lessons, turned into a check that runs on every new bid. Every finding is tied to source evidence; the estimator makes the final call.
$221,915.70 surfaced · $3.44M reviewed
I build applied AI products around a few beliefs, and each one has a receipt:
AI should earn its place.
A fuzzy pricing path was wrong 63 of 66 times it fired. I pulled it before it touched a live quote and kept the deterministic exact-match path.
Pricing QAFailure should become product knowledge.
Stem carries 110+ regression cases, each one a real failure. Every version after it has to pass all of them.
StemHuman authority should follow consequence.
Review Desk surfaced $221,915.70, and it never decides commercial scope. The estimator does.
Review DeskIntelligence has an economic cost.
One trace audit found 1.5 million tokens in a month spent re-reading a single file. A one-line rule closed it the same day.
Context costsThe model is only one part of the product.
I removed the strongest model and made the surrounding system carry the reliability.
The machine survives the modelReceipts
The work
01 / Commercial estimating
A decade of estimating lessons, turned into a check that runs on every new bid. Every finding is tied to source evidence; the estimator makes the final call.
$221,915.70 surfaced · $3.44M reviewed
02 / Workflow systems
The same information was moving by hand through three disconnected systems. A deterministic browse-review-save workflow replaced both manual transfer points.
30 to 60 hrs/wk returned · 12 releases · no rollbacks
03 / Local-first AI
A production AI system built so sensitive personal and professional work stays private without giving up access to capable models and modern agent workflows.
19,124 production events · zero confirmed leaks
What I am working against
None of those are product outcomes.
I care about
The goal isn't maximum AI. It's better work.
Patterns
A meaningful failure should permanently change the system.
How much intelligence does this task economically deserve?
Human-in-the-loop is an allocation problem.
The hard part is often determining what is actually true.
The model is replaceable. The system around it compounds.
My story
I spent ten years estimating and delivering commercial construction work.
Hundreds of projects.
Deadlines. Engineers. Owners. Contractors. Manufacturers. Field teams. Expensive mistakes.
You learn quickly that the impressive answer isn't necessarily the useful one.
Then AI changed what I could build.
The processes I'd spent years tolerating suddenly looked like software problems.
So I started building the software I wished existed.
6,341 contributions 73 repositories since 2023